Requirements

A worked example, annotated

Free analysisNo commitment2 min

What is actually going on

The example below is deliberately ordinary: a small company replacing a manual process. That is the shape of most real projects, and it is the shape that generic RFP templates handle worst.

How the work runs

Step 01

Read the sections and the notes together

Each note explains what the supplier extracts from that section and what happens when it is missing.

Step 02

Substitute your own situation

The structure carries over unchanged to most small business systems.

Step 03

Check it against the checklist

The pre-send checklist catches the gaps that are easy to leave in your own draft.

The problem, as written

"Our eight field engineers complete paper job sheets. Every evening an administrator retypes roughly forty of them into our accounts system. Transcription errors cause about six invoice disputes a month, and the administrator spends around two hours a day on this. We want engineers to record job details on their phones, and that data to reach the accounts system without retyping."

Note what this does. It gives volume, it gives the cost in hours and in disputes, and it states the outcome without naming a technology. A supplier can size this immediately, and can tell you if there is a cheaper route than building software.

Users, as written

"Eight field engineers, using Android phones, often with poor signal. One administrator, on a desktop, who checks and corrects entries before they go through. One manager who needs a weekly summary."

The signal detail is the valuable line. It means the app has to work offline and sync later, which is a materially different piece of software. Left out, it appears after the contract as a change request.

Environment and constraints, as written

"Accounts run on Sage 50, on a machine in the office. We do not know whether it has an API. Budget is 15 to 25 thousand. We would like it running before our busy season in September. Nobody here can maintain software, so we will need a support arrangement."

Admitting the unknown about Sage is better than guessing. Suppliers will price the integration as a stated assumption and flag it as the main risk, which is exactly the conversation you want to have before signing rather than after.

What was asked for in return

"Please break the work into items with days against each. Give a range, not a single figure, and list what the range assumes. Tell us who would do the work. Tell us what happens if the Sage integration turns out to be harder than expected. Confirm that we own the code and the accounts from the start."

Five sentences, and they make the resulting proposals directly comparable. The question about the integration going wrong is the one that separates suppliers who have thought about your project from those who have not.

Common questions

Is this too short to be taken seriously?

Short and specific is taken more seriously than long and generic. Suppliers who require volume to engage are usually the ones with a proposals department.

Should I say we do not know something technical?

Yes. A stated unknown gets priced as an assumption. A hidden one gets discovered mid-project at your expense.

Related

Specialists for this

IP

Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine

$15–$20/ hour

Full-Stack Developer — Websites, Apps, Servers, Databases, AI, SEO & QA

Full-stack developer working across the entire stack — websites, apps, servers, databases, AI integrations, SEO, and QA. Languages & Core: writes code in JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, PHP, Go, and Rust. Architects scalable systems for large-scale projects. Frontend & Interfaces: builds websites and web applications with React and Next.js. Crafts responsive interfaces with Tailwind CSS, Radix UI and Shadcn, adds smooth animations with Framer Motion, and interactive charts with Recharts. SEO Audit & On-Page Optimization: semantic keyword research, resolving technical indexing issues, and optimizing page load speeds. Structures page architecture, meta tags, and multi-language support (i18n). Copywriting & Content Strategy: writes technical articles, drafts precise content briefs for writers, and develops content plans. QA & Testing: full-cycle testing for websites, web services, and Android apps — manual QA for UI/UX and business logic, plus automated testing with Jest, Vitest, Playwright and E2E. Backend, Cloud & Databases: complex API integrations of any scale. Builds servers with Node.js (Express, Fastify). Works with PostgreSQL, MySQL and MongoDB, ORMs (Prisma, Drizzle), and cloud infrastructure (Supabase, Firebase, Cloudflare). Browser Extensions & Automation: develops Manifest V3 browser extensions for Chrome, Edge, Firefox and other browsers. Builds web scrapers for complex data extraction using Puppeteer and Playwright. AI & Intelligent Agents: builds custom AI agents and integrates LLMs from OpenAI, Google Gemini, and Anthropic Claude via API, including Claude Code setups. Servers & DevOps: Linux (Ubuntu) and VPS administration — setup, updates, real-time monitoring, secure process isolation, Nginx, PM2, and CI/CD deployment via GitHub Actions. Telegram Bots: develops advanced Telegram bots (Telegraf, Grammy) integrated with AI, payment gateways, Google Sheets, and crypto exchanges. Desktop Applications: builds cross-platform software for Windows and macOS using Electron and Rust. Additional expertise: site development and customization with WordPress and Astro.

Experience: 16 yearsAvailable Now
JavaScript
TypeScript
Python
React
Next.js
+32
$70–$100/ hour

AI & Distributed Systems Architect | Enterprise AI, RAG, Cloud, Blockchain | Advisory & Fractional Leadership

AI and distributed systems architect providing advisory and fractional leadership on enterprise AI, RAG pipelines, cloud architecture and blockchain-backed data systems.

Experience: 11 yearsPart-time (20h/wk)
AI Engineering
RAG
AWS
Blockchain